|
|
Post by TimPig on Jun 7, 2018 1:49:28 GMT
Bulls send: Trevon Duval Bucks send: 2004 1st Round Pick Mike Daum Tony Pierce Accept. trofie |
|
trofie
New Member
Posts: 58
Likes: 12
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by trofie on Jun 7, 2018 2:08:22 GMT
Yes
|
|
dump
New Member
Posts: 671
Likes: 171
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by dump on Jun 7, 2018 3:08:07 GMT
a first for a shitty PG? Wow
|
|
IanBoyd
New Member
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 315
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jun 7, 2018 3:10:58 GMT
shoulda just taken my offer of 5k for odin
|
|
|
|
Post by Muzunga on Jun 7, 2018 3:12:36 GMT
a first for a shitty PG? Wow He has almost all his upgrades left, he could become good. |
|
IanBoyd
New Member
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 315
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jun 7, 2018 3:20:21 GMT
a first for a shitty PG? Wow He has almost all his upgrades left, he could become good. So he'll have 30 in 3 point shot after he's fully upgraded? |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Jun 7, 2018 3:23:25 GMT
He has almost all his upgrades left, he could become good. So he'll have 30 in 3 point shot after he's fully upgraded? He's used 3, so 27. IMO it's a small price to pay (relative to what other PGs were going for) for a PG who is efficient, even if he doesn't shoot 3s. |
|
dump
New Member
Posts: 671
Likes: 171
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by dump on Jun 7, 2018 3:48:42 GMT
a first for a shitty PG? Wow He has almost all his upgrades left, he could become good.  |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Jun 7, 2018 11:56:11 GMT
a first for a shitty PG? Wow He has almost all his upgrades left, he could become good. Forgot to sign back in as Tim. Also forgot to consider he likely won't become good. |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Jun 7, 2018 11:59:40 GMT
So he'll have 30 in 3 point shot after he's fully upgraded? He's used 3, so 27. IMO it's a small price to pay (relative to what other PGs were going for) for a PG who is efficient, even if he doesn't shoot 3s. Your definition of efficient is .96 pts/tsa, 3 ast/to, and sub-5 reb/36 and sub-2 stocks/36 for his career? Woof. |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Jun 7, 2018 14:47:21 GMT
He's used 3, so 27. IMO it's a small price to pay (relative to what other PGs were going for) for a PG who is efficient, even if he doesn't shoot 3s. Your definition of efficient is .96 pts/tsa, 3 ast/to, and sub-5 reb/36 and sub-2 stocks/36 for his career? Woof. He shot like 54% from the field during pre-preseason. |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Jun 7, 2018 15:48:05 GMT
Your definition of efficient is .96 pts/tsa, 3 ast/to, and sub-5 reb/36 and sub-2 stocks/36 for his career? Woof. He shot like 54% from the field during pre-preseason. ...in a small sample that's representative of 3% of his career attempts, as a backup, with little to no volume, with sim DC's, and does what I posted above otherwise in the much larger sample where GM's control depth charts. |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Jun 7, 2018 16:26:20 GMT
He shot like 54% from the field during pre-preseason. ...in a small sample that's representative of 3% of his career attempts, as a backup, with little to no volume, with sim DC's, and does what I posted above otherwise in the much larger sample where GM's control depth charts.  |
|
