|
|
Post by killybing on May 18, 2020 21:33:36 GMT
yeah?
for example, i had guaranteed 3.1 this season. could've been traded.
cool?
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on May 18, 2020 21:58:21 GMT
I like the idea but for now I’m saying no because it means eric would have to have an extra round worth of players at least for each class because then all the picks would get traded and used
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on May 18, 2020 22:04:35 GMT
Yeah it strikes me as a method for a lot of confusion.
I feel like you’d be better off not creating extra processes for Eric and instead just picking someone then trading them to the team you would’ve traded the pick to.
|
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on May 18, 2020 22:43:00 GMT
No
|
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on May 18, 2020 23:30:36 GMT
yeah?
for example, i had guaranteed 3.1 this season. could've been traded.
cool?
I think it would be cool, and could be done. Just work it out before hand, make selections like normal and then trade in minors after. |
|
|
|
Post by eric on May 18, 2020 23:43:52 GMT
yeah? for example, i had guaranteed 3.1 this season. could've been traded. cool?
I think it would be cool, and could be done. Just work it out before hand, make selections like normal and then trade in minors after. i was on the fence about the idea before but this seems like an extremely easy way of achieving the goal within the existing mechanisms so let's just go with this good work team |
|
