|
|
Post by Muzunga on Mar 17, 2020 15:56:19 GMT
Soup and Bankz are back? The Rona is really brining everyone together.
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Mar 17, 2020 15:56:27 GMT
Also me reading the role breakdowns for the town  |
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Mar 17, 2020 15:58:00 GMT
yeah it was definitely a strange reaction for sure, i'm just holding my vote until we hopefully get some more people checking in w/thoughts/votes
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 17, 2020 16:01:05 GMT
Soup and Bankz are back? The Rona is really brining everyone together. It's a little bit weird seeing Soup come in and talk about needing to be reminded of roles, refresh his memory, vote vs. no vote, etc. Outside of the one-day game we had this weekend, it's been just as long since any of us have played TMBSL mafia. IIRC, during the Mafia games in 4.0 he was very active and very quick to start digging. This makes me think he likely had previous Mafia experience and forgetting all of that and changing your tendency completely strikes me as odd. |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 17, 2020 16:13:32 GMT
@bkisok can you update the thread title to include that it's open, when day 1 ends, etc?
|
|
|
|
Post by Muzunga on Mar 17, 2020 16:20:11 GMT
Agree that it was a weird comment. As Beanie Siegel said, "I got my radar up"
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Mar 17, 2020 16:23:31 GMT
ill be sure to not provide any analysis this time so as to not throw off @muzunga
|
|
|
|
Post by pointyegg on Mar 17, 2020 16:27:52 GMT
I’d say no vote is the way to go. Not sure what the best strategy is yet but I can assure that putting our sights on a town member wouldn’t be the best idea for day 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Majic on Mar 17, 2020 16:29:03 GMT
couple thought.
Agree that Skrouses initial comments wre a bit strange. Almost seems like he had it thought up ahead of time in preparation for someone accusing him. When Ank randomly at the start of last game I just thought to ignore it since i knew I wasnt mafia.. Then again, someone coming at you right out of the gate can create that.
Soup not knowing how the game is played is funny and odd considering how much he was involved with Mafia last time around.
I am always suspsicious of anyone that makes a simple, short and obvious statement that someone else already mentioned. To me thats a potential mafia person just trying to "be active and fit in"
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 17, 2020 16:30:55 GMT
I’d say no vote is the way to go. Not sure what the best strategy is yet but I can assure that putting our sights on a town member wouldn’t be the best idea for day 1 It's definitely bad in the short term to kill a town member but we have to consider the long game. Townies are going to die, no doubt. But if the logic is "the odds are higher we hit town than mafia", the same logic is going to apply for day 2 and maybe day 3 as well. If we follow that logic, then the only details we're potentially getting are from a possible sheriff and then some other random occurrence (i.e. mafia trying to hit a veteran that we also don't know exists). |
|
|
|
Post by Muzunga on Mar 17, 2020 16:31:58 GMT
ill be sure to not provide any analysis this time so as to not throw off @muzunga Thanks, that will make you less spiciouus. |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 17, 2020 16:32:23 GMT
couple thought. Agree that Skrouses initial comments wre a bit strange. Almost seems like he had it thought up ahead of time in preparation for someone accusing him. When Ank randomly at the start of last game I just thought to ignore it since i knew I wasnt mafia.. Then again, someone coming at you right out of the gate can create that. Soup not knowing how the game is played is funny and odd considering how much he was involved with Mafia last time around. I am always suspsicious of anyone that makes a simple, short and obvious statement that someone else already mentioned. To me thats a potential mafia person just trying to "be active and fit in" Your last line I agree with. However, you just did exactly that with regards to Soup and, to a lesser extent, Skrouse. I'd say the only thing you "added", was that you faced a similar accusation from Ank last game. |
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Mar 17, 2020 16:33:57 GMT
|
|
newishguy
New Member
Posts: 93
Likes: 27
Joined: December 2019
|
Post by newishguy on Mar 17, 2020 16:38:02 GMT
Sorry, been working. Don't get the luxury of working from home yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 17, 2020 16:38:09 GMT
Haven't seen any of them on yet today... Fortunately sim is running soon so hopefully that pulls in at least Delap and Newguy. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2020 16:45:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Majic on Mar 17, 2020 16:49:29 GMT
couple thought. Agree that Skrouses initial comments wre a bit strange. Almost seems like he had it thought up ahead of time in preparation for someone accusing him. When Ank randomly at the start of last game I just thought to ignore it since i knew I wasnt mafia.. Then again, someone coming at you right out of the gate can create that. Soup not knowing how the game is played is funny and odd considering how much he was involved with Mafia last time around. I am always suspsicious of anyone that makes a simple, short and obvious statement that someone else already mentioned. To me thats a potential mafia person just trying to "be active and fit in" Your last line I agree with. However, you just did exactly that with regards to Soup and, to a lesser extent, Skrouse. I'd say the only thing you "added", was that you faced a similar accusation from Ank last game. that is a fair thing to point out. I guess in my mind the difference is when there is a lack of detail and its just a single sentence. Fecta post just above mine is the perfect example.. agreed with something that many others already said, only posted 1 single sentence and provided no additional thought or detail. In my mind, there is no point to post that unless you just want to show activity. |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 17, 2020 16:50:26 GMT
Your last line I agree with. However, you just did exactly that with regards to Soup and, to a lesser extent, Skrouse. I'd say the only thing you "added", was that you faced a similar accusation from Ank last game. that is a fair thing to point out. I guess in my mind the difference is when there is a lack of detail and its just a single sentence. Fecta post just above mine is the perfect example.. agreed with something that many others already said, only posted 1 single sentence and provided no additional thought or detail. In my mind, there is no point to post that unless you just want to show activity. 100% of the things Fecta posts are one sentence that lack insight, Mafia or not. |
|
soup
New Member
Posts: 343
Likes: 22
Joined: March 2018
|
Post by soup on Mar 17, 2020 16:52:26 GMT
The spin team is out I see. No where did I say I didn’t know how to play the game. It’s been like 3 years since I played. I definitely needed to read the rules again.
Trying to muddy the water with spins like that make me very suspicious of Tim and majic though. Plus Ank, I’m always suspicious of his ass.
“Can we not?”
- Ank, drunk, on 3 am podcast that didn’t record
|
|
soup
New Member
Posts: 343
Likes: 22
Joined: March 2018
|
Post by soup on Mar 17, 2020 16:58:18 GMT
Didn’t we used to everyone vote for one person so that everyone had one vote on day 1? Were y’all for or against that strategy?
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 17, 2020 17:01:21 GMT
Didn’t we used to everyone vote for one person so that everyone had one vote on day 1? Were y’all for or against that strategy? IMO putting in a plan like that seems a bit too structured and means even less will be given away. The idea of all of us agreeing on who each person is going to vote for shares nothing. If everyone knows they're only going to receive one vote, there's no risk in who you do or don't vote for. |
|
soup
New Member
Posts: 343
Likes: 22
Joined: March 2018
|
Post by soup on Mar 17, 2020 17:04:12 GMT
Didn’t we used to everyone vote for one person so that everyone had one vote on day 1? Were y’all for or against that strategy? IMO putting in a plan like that seems a bit too structured and means even less will be given away. The idea of all of us agreeing on who each person is going to vote for shares nothing. If everyone knows they're only going to receive one vote, there's no risk in who you do or don't vote for. I don’t know. Seemed like in the past when we did someone always showed their ass in the end by switching their vote. |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 17, 2020 17:14:16 GMT
IMO putting in a plan like that seems a bit too structured and means even less will be given away. The idea of all of us agreeing on who each person is going to vote for shares nothing. If everyone knows they're only going to receive one vote, there's no risk in who you do or don't vote for. I don’t know. Seemed like in the past when we did someone always showed their ass in the end by switching their vote. What are your thoughts on voting for people who don't make an appearance?
If someone isn't participating at all, it seems like a 99% chance they're town as other mafia members would be PMing them and pressuring the hell out of them to do something. |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Mar 17, 2020 17:17:51 GMT
Didn’t we used to everyone vote for one person so that everyone had one vote on day 1? Were y’all for or against that strategy? I came up with that once at the end of an all-vanilla game and it backfired tremendously and the town lost I think. |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Mar 17, 2020 17:18:28 GMT
But I would like to point out that it backfired because some townie went rogue (pretty sure it was Heebs) and not because it was a bad plan.
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 17, 2020 17:19:58 GMT
But I would like to point out that it backfired because some townie went rogue (pretty sure it was Heebs) and not because it was a bad plan. I don't think there's any way we can get 12 people to agree to follow a plan through to the end of the day, especially if 3-4 are inactive so far. Also, I still don't see the benefit for the same reason I mentioned earlier. |
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Mar 17, 2020 17:22:39 GMT
I'm down for the everyone votes for 1 person strategy, seems pretty straight forward. But if we have someone MIA, then we'll be a vote off, guess we would then vote for the MIA person?
|
|
soup
New Member
Posts: 343
Likes: 22
Joined: March 2018
|
Post by soup on Mar 17, 2020 17:24:02 GMT
I don’t know. Seemed like in the past when we did someone always showed their ass in the end by switching their vote. What are your thoughts on voting for people who don't make an appearance?
If someone isn't participating at all, it seems like a 99% chance they're town as other mafia members would be PMing them and pressuring the hell out of them to do something.I think it’s a coin flip just like most other plans. I guess silver lining is you get rid of someone inactive. I think I’d rather go no vote so we don’t lose anyone though. |
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Mar 17, 2020 17:24:34 GMT
if everyone votes for one person then the mafia easily disguises a vote and then one likely town member is gone...this makes no sense to me
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Mar 17, 2020 17:25:50 GMT
I'm down for the everyone votes for 1 person strategy, seems pretty straight forward. But if we have someone MIA, then we'll be a vote off, guess we would then vote for the MIA person?  |
|
