|
|
Post by eric on Oct 25, 2019 14:48:15 GMT
i took the league before sim 1 and set all DCs to outside focus with the perimeter starters as scoring options here are two graphs -the % of all league leaders in PPG who were PG SG and SF -the % of only PG SG PF and C league leaders in PPG who were PG and SG  (the graphs overlap for awhile because the highest ranked SF was only #16) hence, whether PPG favors bigs or guards depends on DC settings, not players SF is always in a tough spot because inside favors bigs and outside favors guards but no focus favors SF |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Oct 25, 2019 15:01:26 GMT
How...about...that
|
|
|
bk
Guest
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by bk on Oct 25, 2019 15:05:51 GMT
please label your fucking axis wtf is x
|
|
|
bk
Guest
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by bk on Oct 25, 2019 15:07:07 GMT
also how did scoring options work was it
1 - PG
2 - SG
3 - SF
or was it random
if you did
1 - SF
2 - SG
3 - PG
do you still see the same dip in sfs
|
|
|
bk
Guest
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by bk on Oct 25, 2019 15:13:15 GMT
also can you compare it to the opposite situation
run everyone in inside
and bigs as scoring options
is the % of bigs as scoring leaders in this situation higher than the % of wings that are scoring leaders in the OP situation
until that is looked at you can't draw any conclusions about wings being worse than bigs because of the offense
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Oct 25, 2019 15:47:12 GMT
x is how far in the league leaders the reading is
so 100% of the top 1 ppg are guards, 100% of the top 4, 80% of the top 5, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Oct 25, 2019 15:48:18 GMT
also can you compare it to the opposite situation run everyone in inside and bigs as scoring options is the % of bigs as scoring leaders in this situation higher than the % of wings that are scoring leaders in the OP situation until that is looked at you can't draw any conclusions about wings being worse than bigs because of the offense the hypothesis of the experiment was if point per game league leaders could be made predominantly guards by DC settings they can the experiment is over |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Oct 25, 2019 15:55:37 GMT
I bet the Bulls were pretty good in the test sim.
#analysis
|
|
|
bk
Guest
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by bk on Oct 25, 2019 16:05:23 GMT
also can you compare it to the opposite situation run everyone in inside and bigs as scoring options is the % of bigs as scoring leaders in this situation higher than the % of wings that are scoring leaders in the OP situation until that is looked at you can't draw any conclusions about wings being worse than bigs because of the offense the hypothesis of the experiment was if point per game league leaders could be made predominantly guards by DC settings they can the experiment is over
well the whole point of the argument was whether bigs and guards have similar scoring grades and you said it was the DC settings
then you decided to restrict it to just the top 10 where your conclusion holds true due to small sample size
when extended to more players we see that bigs are in fact better scorers than guards even when accounting for DC settings
which is the opposite of what you've proposed, but you won't post the direct comparison because it would prove you wrong
|
|
