|
|
Post by jhb on Sept 27, 2019 19:50:59 GMT
Players that have 2 or less years experience could be signed directly by our minor league teams to minimum contracts. This would happen at the same time the MLE/LLE signing period opens post-TC.
Gives the opportunity to try out players that otherwise may go unsigned and disappear from the software because they weren’t selected in the draft and don’t have good enough shown grades to warrant one of the limited slots on the active teams.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 19:52:51 GMT
of course
|
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Sept 27, 2019 19:53:40 GMT
I would even welcome them getting 3 year MIN deals or setting up a system where you can extend them 2 additional years at a cost.
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Sept 27, 2019 20:13:05 GMT
what if we did like the mentor system, UDFA rookies can be sent to the minor leagues while on their first year
i'm leery of three year deals for free birds
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 20:29:37 GMT
what if we did like the mentor system, UDFA rookies can be sent to the minor leagues while on their first year i'm leery of three year deals for free birds i think any responsible gm already has plenty of guys with birds anyway |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Sept 27, 2019 20:43:06 GMT
What about two year deals
|
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Sept 27, 2019 20:52:59 GMT
1 year deal, but you have to pay to extend, like MLE or LLE deals.
|
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Sept 27, 2019 20:53:33 GMT
what if we did like the mentor system, UDFA rookies can be sent to the minor leagues while on their first year i'm leery of three year deals for free birds it sounds like you are choosing to keep players out of work in favor of automated robotitrons. |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Sept 27, 2019 23:07:26 GMT
What about two year deals okay, that is called a compromise, and it is not ideal to sum up win/win - udfa to minors, win/lose - only draftees to minors, lose/win - everyone to minors, and the answer is... keep players out of work in favor of automated robotitrons.  no but seriously folks, i |
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Sept 28, 2019 14:56:52 GMT
so what's the deal... can we extend a rookie UDFA or anything?
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Sept 28, 2019 17:12:08 GMT
so what's the deal... can we extend a rookie UDFA or anything? next year's UDFA will be allowed to sign on a min with a minor league team starting at 10 PM after TC then we'll see how it goes |
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Sept 28, 2019 17:32:55 GMT
But no possibility for extension?
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Sept 28, 2019 18:01:58 GMT
But no possibility for extension? correct |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2019 18:44:47 GMT
how about something like we can extend but if we do they have to be promoted and stay there
|
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Sept 28, 2019 23:03:35 GMT
Nay, minors are for drafted rookies, 3rd round already gives you an extra, we don't need anymore
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Sept 29, 2019 12:43:06 GMT
Nay, minors are for drafted rookies, 3rd round already gives you an extra, we don't need anymore Skrouse this is the worst take you’ve ever had |
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Sept 29, 2019 15:15:43 GMT
Nay, minors are for drafted rookies, 3rd round already gives you an extra, we don't need anymore Skrouse this is the worst take you’ve ever had Still better than any take you've had. Why do we need more players parked on Roboteams? Why cant they just be signed as FAs to the normal teams if they're good enough? If they're not good enough, oh well. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2019 15:26:11 GMT
i am bk and i am dumb
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Sept 29, 2019 18:29:19 GMT
Skrouse this is the worst take you’ve ever had Still better than any take you've had. Why do we need more players parked on Roboteams? Why cant they just be signed as FAs to the normal teams if they're good enough? If they're not good enough, oh well. How do you know how good they are if they never play and then disappear from the league? |
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Sept 29, 2019 19:41:43 GMT
Still better than any take you've had. Why do we need more players parked on Roboteams? Why cant they just be signed as FAs to the normal teams if they're good enough? If they're not good enough, oh well. How do you know how good they are if they never play and then disappear from the league? You've got 3 IR spots. Play em in PS. I'm not a fan of us being able to fill a 2nd team full of guys we picked up off FA. Draft picks are different, everyone only gets 2. |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Sept 29, 2019 20:18:03 GMT
It’s another avenue to scout talent in a league where very few talented players change teams every year
The additional intel would be extremely valuable versus having a bunch of no name robots play
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Sept 30, 2019 20:14:54 GMT
It’s another avenue to scout talent in a league where very few talented players change teams every year The additional intel would be extremely valuable versus having a bunch of no name robots play I have a lot of draft picks in the coming years that will leave me when their rookie contracts are up. |
|
|
|
Post by Majic on Sept 30, 2019 20:34:37 GMT
How do you know how good they are if they never play and then disappear from the league? You've got 3 IR spots. Play em in PS. I'm not a fan of us being able to fill a 2nd team full of guys we picked up off FA. Draft picks are different, everyone only gets 2. its also only for 2 year. So if a player ends up being good then he is guaranteed to hit the open market and any team can be free to sign him. I would rather have this then players getting deleted from the software if they are usable long term. |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Sept 30, 2019 21:04:16 GMT
Also what’s the point of a bunch of robots playing on teams if those teams could be essentially giving young players free tryouts
|
|
