|
|
Post by eric on Mar 29, 2019 18:22:42 GMT
So the last places robots show up is the Players of the Week sometimes. Since I'm calculating PER every sim anyway, it would be easy to calculate a PER-minutes generated per sim and if a robot wins give it to the top player instead (or top two if there are two robots or if the top human player already has the other POTW). Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 29, 2019 18:46:17 GMT
Sounds good to me.
Down with robots.
Is it confirmed that this is how Heavyreign calculates POTW?
|
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Mar 29, 2019 18:51:14 GMT
kill the robots
|
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Mar 29, 2019 18:53:07 GMT
Aye
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Mar 29, 2019 19:24:41 GMT
Sounds good to me. Down with robots. Is it confirmed that this is how Heavyreign calculates POTW? i would be extraordinarily surprised if it was, as the software was created certainly before PER was widely accepted and maybe even before it was widely published. i did try to crack the Player of the Game formula once by simming hundreds of thousands of games until players with nearly identical stat lines were produced, but ran into the limit of the software's pseudo RNG without generating enough such couplets to do so. my feeling is we can't get the POTW formula and it's probably worse anyway so a nod's as good as a wink to bjorn stronginthearm, your uncle. u wot m8 |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 19:29:53 GMT
do gamescore not per
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 19:30:12 GMT
or WS/48 with a 100 minutes cutoff
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Mar 29, 2019 20:46:20 GMT
or WS/48 with a 100 minutes cutoff calculating WS every sim would be prohibitive amounts of effort for something that only happens twice a year, and Game Score is bad. |
|
