Post by eric on Mar 26, 2019 17:05:19 GMT
Currently we do 1, 2, 3, 4&5.
Here is how the average signings on each day look for the two years before contraction and the three years after 2012:
11/29 is .379 so we've only seen a real change in a drop in day 2 and an increase in days 4/5.
As such, the proposal is to change to 1, 2&3, 4, 5.
This gives GMs better proportioned inputs without changing the overall schedule.
.
Additionally, I tried taking all cap space away from computer teams. This saw 12/1/1/7/4 signings instead of 12/2/2/9/10 this year. We expect there to be a few less because I didn't add in the day 2-5 bids, but clearly the teams having cap space parameter is not significant if it exists at all.
Here is how the average signings on each day look for the two years before contraction and the three years after 2012:
1 2 3 4 5 day
10 3 4 8 9 since
26 18 12 17 22 before
.372 .171 .333 .505 .424 ratio11/29 is .379 so we've only seen a real change in a drop in day 2 and an increase in days 4/5.
As such, the proposal is to change to 1, 2&3, 4, 5.
This gives GMs better proportioned inputs without changing the overall schedule.
.
Additionally, I tried taking all cap space away from computer teams. This saw 12/1/1/7/4 signings instead of 12/2/2/9/10 this year. We expect there to be a few less because I didn't add in the day 2-5 bids, but clearly the teams having cap space parameter is not significant if it exists at all.
