|
|
Post by Druce on Jun 30, 2018 6:03:10 GMT
Declarations and Early Entries will happen the same day as the lottery.
G-League promotions/demotions will be most likely limited to a 3 times per year, once after the draft, once after preseason, once after G-League season sim.
If anyone has anything they'd like to see changed but don't want to post, feel free to PM me and we can discuss.
I'm not going to police depth charts, I'll leave that up to league members.
Kicking around the idea of raising caps to 90 across the board save for Inside (100) and shot blocking.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2018 6:38:19 GMT
pg/sg definitely dont need inside raised
|
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Jun 30, 2018 11:12:23 GMT
Don’t mess with the caps. I think they are great right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Jun 30, 2018 11:19:38 GMT
I agree with Delap, I would leave player caps alone for now.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2018 12:41:20 GMT
If anyone has anything they'd like to see changed but don't want to post, feel free to PM me and we can discuss. *cough lotto cough* |
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Jun 30, 2018 14:23:47 GMT
If anyone has anything they'd like to see changed but don't want to post, feel free to PM me and we can discuss. *cough lotto cough* I'm a fan of the current system personally |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jun 30, 2018 15:35:24 GMT
save the unweighted lotto
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Jun 30, 2018 16:00:44 GMT
I too like the caps where they are.
Unweighted lotto can stay or go. I guess if it does get changed we should know like 5 seasons in advance though so people don’t trade their picks without that knowledge.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2018 16:06:54 GMT
I was actually considering dropping the sf inside cap to 85
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Jun 30, 2018 16:47:00 GMT
Change unweighted lotto to 6 teams
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Jun 30, 2018 16:47:23 GMT
Or lotto for slots 1-6 with current system
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2018 16:49:32 GMT
i'm ready to tank
|
|
ahebrewtoo
New Member
Posts: 796
Likes: 225
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by ahebrewtoo on Jun 30, 2018 22:01:57 GMT
Don't mess with unweighted lotto. Don't mess with caps. Why can you only buyout players with 3 or more years on their deal? Seems weird not to allow buyouts for 2 yr contracts. tmbsl5.proboards.com/thread/39/buyouts |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Jun 30, 2018 22:29:31 GMT
Don't mess with unweighted lotto. Don't mess with caps. Why can you only buyout players with 3 or more years on their deal? Seems weird not to allow buyouts for 2 yr contracts. tmbsl5.proboards.com/thread/39/buyoutsI don’t think people have been following this lately. |
|
fason
New Member
Posts: 743
Likes: 291
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by fason on Jun 30, 2018 22:46:45 GMT
One of Tupac's most overrated songs
|
|
|
|
Post by wee2dee on Jul 1, 2018 0:45:52 GMT
but one of Bowie's best.
|
|
dump
New Member
Posts: 671
Likes: 171
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by dump on Jul 1, 2018 5:06:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jul 2, 2018 2:45:08 GMT
A thing I just did on the Magic's lab, applied first choice up to cap then added the rest to 2nd choice. I'll be doing this moving forward,and noting how many points went into what. If you'd rather the full x points go into the second category just let me know and I'll change it.
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Jul 2, 2018 2:48:15 GMT
A thing I just did on the Magic's lab, applied first choice up to cap then added the rest to 2nd choice. I'll be doing this moving forward,and noting how many points went into what. If you'd rather the full x points go into the second category just let me know and I'll change it. <iframe width="18.24000000000001" height="3.5600000000000023" style="position: absolute; width: 18.24000000000001px; height: 3.5600000000000023px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none;left: 15px; top: -5px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_2447894" scrolling="no"></iframe> <iframe width="18.24000000000001" height="3.5600000000000023" style="position: absolute; width: 18.24px; height: 3.56px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 857px; top: -5px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_81470864" scrolling="no"></iframe> <iframe width="18.24000000000001" height="3.5600000000000023" style="position: absolute; width: 18.24px; height: 3.56px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 15px; top: 118px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_18182298" scrolling="no"></iframe> <iframe width="18.24000000000001" height="3.5600000000000023" style="position: absolute; width: 18.24px; height: 3.56px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 857px; top: 118px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_39221597" scrolling="no"></iframe> I think that's the same way Odin did it (first choice to cap, then the rest into second choice) and I think that's how most people have interpreted it. For example, in Majic's Lab for the Blazers he specified +10 to Strength and +10 to Inside when he wanted a specific amount into each attribute. |
|
IanBoyd
New Member
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 315
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jul 2, 2018 3:17:32 GMT
A thing I just did on the Magic's lab, applied first choice up to cap then added the rest to 2nd choice. I'll be doing this moving forward,and noting how many points went into what. If you'd rather the full x points go into the second category just let me know and I'll change it. that's the standard practice as far as i know |
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jul 2, 2018 19:13:22 GMT
never mind
|
|
