Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 14:17:36 GMT
what would you like to see?
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jun 18, 2018 14:26:50 GMT
im just going to spitball a bunch of shit i think of throughout the day, with consideration being given to time consumption to complete.
|
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Jun 18, 2018 14:28:56 GMT
I think a summit would be good personally
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jun 18, 2018 14:32:17 GMT
"tale of the tape" between some top prospects, just like a checklist type deal with guys at similar positions highlight key attributes and who's better
"draft round table" you give a set of say 4 GMs prospect info and they give their opinions on each guy
|
|
ahebrewtoo
New Member
Posts: 796
Likes: 225
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by ahebrewtoo on Jun 18, 2018 14:57:00 GMT
No grades. Prospects included in preseason in the G league and set to starters. Eric write a macro to screen capture just the prospects stats and have those posted. We draft based on small sample size stats and not grades.
|
|
|
|
Post by Majic on Jun 18, 2018 15:29:55 GMT
summit or like heebs mentioned
just a way to see even small sample sized stats
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 15:40:55 GMT
dont like summits
|
|
|
|
Post by 👼Saint Panktrick's Day👼 on Jun 18, 2018 15:45:33 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Muzunga on Jun 18, 2018 16:24:38 GMT
A three point shooting contest ?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 16:27:52 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 16:29:42 GMT
What if i imported the class into a league of all F- players, simmed to asg, and uploaded that
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 16:30:02 GMT
Not the whole season, just day 60
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 16:30:35 GMT
Maybe player of the week/month
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Jun 18, 2018 16:32:11 GMT
"tale of the tape" between some top prospects, just like a checklist type deal with guys at similar positions highlight key attributes and who's better "draft round table" you give a set of say 4 GMs prospect info and they give their opinions on each guy I like the first one a lot. I'm perfectly fine with there being no summit, but what if we did something to understand the profile guys a bit more? I think this could be an extension of Druce's first suggestion. For the second idea, I take it we'd just be offering our opinions based on what we know of the guys IRL? What do you mean by "prospect info"? |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 16:33:44 GMT
"tale of the tape" between some top prospects, just like a checklist type deal with guys at similar positions highlight key attributes and who's better "draft round table" you give a set of say 4 GMs prospect info and they give their opinions on each guy I like the first one a lot. I'm perfectly fine with there being no summit, but what if we did something to understand the profile guys a bit more? I think this could be an extension of Druce's first suggestion. For the second idea, I take it we'd just be offering our opinions based on what we know of the guys IRL? What do you mean by "prospect info"? what is there to understand about the profiles? it's strengths and weaknesses, pretty straight forward |
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jun 18, 2018 16:34:49 GMT
"tale of the tape" between some top prospects, just like a checklist type deal with guys at similar positions highlight key attributes and who's better "draft round table" you give a set of say 4 GMs prospect info and they give their opinions on each guy I like the first one a lot. I'm perfectly fine with there being no summit, but what if we did something to understand the profile guys a bit more? I think this could be an extension of Druce's first suggestion. For the second idea, I take it we'd just be offering our opinions based on what we know of the guys IRL? What do you mean by "prospect info"?i mean odin drops the participants some info about say 15 prospects and then the participants discuss. could include said info about the prospects at the end |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Jun 18, 2018 16:45:28 GMT
I like the first one a lot. I'm perfectly fine with there being no summit, but what if we did something to understand the profile guys a bit more? I think this could be an extension of Druce's first suggestion. For the second idea, I take it we'd just be offering our opinions based on what we know of the guys IRL? What do you mean by "prospect info"? what is there to understand about the profiles? it's strengths and weaknesses, pretty straight forward That's true, I was just building on Druce's idea. In my mind, I was going to say something like a comparison between Kenyon Martin, Stromile Swift, and Marcus Fizer (three of the top PFs), but I guess strengths/weaknesses is enough. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 16:50:32 GMT
I like the first one a lot. I'm perfectly fine with there being no summit, but what if we did something to understand the profile guys a bit more? I think this could be an extension of Druce's first suggestion. For the second idea, I take it we'd just be offering our opinions based on what we know of the guys IRL? What do you mean by "prospect info"?i mean odin drops the participants some info about say 15 prospects and then the participants discuss. could include said info about the prospects at the end what info am i giving? i go by your profiles that are posted publicly |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Jun 18, 2018 16:52:04 GMT
i mean odin drops the participants some info about say 15 prospects and then the participants discuss. could include said info about the prospects at the end what info am i giving? i go by your profiles that are posted publicly Sounds like what Fecta and I did on Pod Save 4.0 when we discussed draft prospects, a segment that everyone hated. |
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jun 18, 2018 16:56:39 GMT
i mean odin drops the participants some info about say 15 prospects and then the participants discuss. could include said info about the prospects at the end what info am i giving? i go by your profiles that are posted publicly right, but obviously the profiles don't cover everything, could say which guys seem to be close to breaking out, or they might take a bit to be a starter, may have gone overlooked, maybe not as bad as previously thought at x, idk |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 20:16:48 GMT
what info am i giving? i go by your profiles that are posted publicly right, but obviously the profiles don't cover everything, could say which guys seem to be close to breaking out, or they might take a bit to be a starter, may have gone overlooked, maybe not as bad as previously thought at x, idk i don't have most of that info |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Jun 19, 2018 11:13:32 GMT
What if Druce wrote basic profiles with several strengths and weaknesses, then Odin made the class from those. Then he could upload the draft file the day of the draft or slightly before and then we could draft from there. Maybe even a throwaway "combine" thread that includes some notes about particular prospects and their strengths?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2018 1:58:04 GMT
What if Druce wrote basic profiles with several strengths and weaknesses, then Odin made the class from those. Then he could upload the draft file the day of the draft or slightly before and then we could draft from there. Maybe even a throwaway "combine" thread that includes some notes about particular prospects and their strengths? how is that different than whats happening now |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Jun 20, 2018 12:45:04 GMT
It isn't.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2018 16:00:31 GMT
This is my favorite idea yet |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Jun 20, 2018 16:12:46 GMT
We have strength, quickness, and Jalen's Jems.
What if we just added a "vertical" test? Seems...simple.
|
|
