IanBoyd
New Member
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 315
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by IanBoyd on May 31, 2018 17:49:51 GMT
post here if you had a player that offered to resign and was signed to a non max deal in day 1 and you wish to initiate stealback procedures
|
|
|
|
Post by Majic on May 31, 2018 21:28:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Jun 1, 2018 0:04:10 GMT
I’m matching the original offer for Kostas Antenkounmpo plus 10% or whatever
|
|
IanBoyd
New Member
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 315
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jun 1, 2018 0:18:26 GMT
take a screenshot of odin's pm to you of the resign offer pls
|
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Jun 1, 2018 0:24:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Jun 1, 2018 0:30:19 GMT
If it means Ank can’t offer another MLE, then never mind. I don’t feel that is fair.
|
|
IanBoyd
New Member
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 315
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jun 1, 2018 0:36:35 GMT
also because of the 1st year amount, don't think you're allowed to initiate steal back
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jun 1, 2018 11:36:07 GMT
also because of the 1st year amount, don't think you're allowed to initiate steal back rule (3) "smaller" is defined as yearly average Delaps re-sign yearly average is higher |
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jun 1, 2018 11:36:32 GMT
If it means Ank can’t offer another MLE, then never mind. I don’t feel that is fair. i don't believe that to be the case |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2018 12:34:27 GMT
If it means Ank can’t offer another MLE, then never mind. I don’t feel that is fair. It would. I can see a work around. But im not sure if i should |
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Jun 1, 2018 12:35:35 GMT
If it means Ank can’t offer another MLE, then never mind. I don’t feel that is fair. It would. I can see a work around. But im not sure if i should Yeah, ignore that. It seems unfair to him in that case.
Add a clause that those signed to MLE or LLE can't be stolen back.
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Jun 1, 2018 12:42:40 GMT
That's the danger of offering MLEs to guys that could be stolen...lose your MLE/LLE until the end of the FA period and post-TC signings.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2018 12:43:34 GMT
Nah
Buyer beware iyam
|
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Jun 1, 2018 13:05:14 GMT
That's the danger of offering MLEs to guys that could be stolen...lose your MLE/LLE until the end of the FA period and post-TC signings.
That makes sense if you KNOW who was offered a re-sign... but we don't have that information anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by 👼Saint Panktrick's Day👼 on Jun 1, 2018 13:07:55 GMT
I feel like losing your MLE is pretty fucked up. And not at all in the spirit of the rule.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2018 13:10:19 GMT
again, there's totally a work around
|
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Jun 1, 2018 13:13:17 GMT
again, there's totally a work around
Let the record state that I'm in favor of both work and reach arounds.
If you feel it won't penalize Ank, go ahead. If it will, I rescind my offer.
|
|
|
|
Post by 👼Saint Panktrick's Day👼 on Jun 1, 2018 13:32:46 GMT
What workaround are you thinking?
I’ve got:
1. Change salaries on my roster to give me 4.5 million in space. Restrict my offer to 1 year, 4.5 million. Change altered salary back after FA.
2. Use proxy team with wombo cap space (e.g. Nugs this year). So if I offer someone a MLE, you have that team make a 1 year, 4.5 million offer on my behalf. This would only work if said team with cap wasn’t also pursuing the same player. And if the “MLE” signing would not mess with the proxy team’s other FA activity. If signed by proxy team, you’d just edit that player to my roster.
Honestly both kind of suck.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2018 13:38:32 GMT
2 with cavs
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2018 13:39:15 GMT
bc he's not sending bids
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2018 14:23:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Jun 1, 2018 18:06:21 GMT
I feel like losing your MLE is pretty fucked up. And not at all in the spirit of the rule. This unless you know the the contract they resigned for, seems unfair |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2018 13:35:10 GMT
moving forward as long as i save correctly (and i will) guys won't lose their mle/lle.
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Jun 2, 2018 13:55:32 GMT
You gonna sim day 1 and then go back and edit everyone with the contract they signed onto the team and do say 1 with no bids
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2018 14:02:55 GMT
ish
|
|
|
|
Post by wee2dee on Jun 2, 2018 22:24:51 GMT
taking back Borat at 3.5 x 10% 3.85 million @odin  |
|
IanBoyd
New Member
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 315
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jun 2, 2018 23:13:50 GMT
taking back Borat at 3.5 x 10% 3.85 million @odin Steal backs are only for day 1 signings |
|
|
|
Post by wee2dee on Jun 2, 2018 23:23:58 GMT
taking back Borat at 3.5 x 10% 3.85 million @odin Steal backs are only for day 1 signings to me this reads that after Sim 2 is the last time you can - "Sim 2 is Day 2, Sim 3 is Day 3, Sim 4 is Days 4/5) Resignings can still be accepted through Sim 3 (but they can't be stolen back after Sim 2!)" |
|
IanBoyd
New Member
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 315
Joined: February 2018
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jun 2, 2018 23:30:45 GMT
after sim 2 is for accepting resignings, not for stealbacks.
(but they can't be stolen back after sim 2), we're now after sim 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jun 3, 2018 4:13:03 GMT
FWIW I interpreted this the same way ward did
|
|
