|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on May 12, 2020 23:00:25 GMT
Myles Turner C 6'11" 240 19 Texas
It’s not often you see a guy pushing 7-feet among the conference leaders in free throw percentage, but Myles 89% clip ranks him 2nd in the Big 12, and 30th in the NCAA. Young for his class, Myles’ accomplishments and polish at this point make him a very, very enticing prospect. With continued growth and polish he has the potential to be among the best shooting big men and stretch 4’s in the game. A 40% shooter from 3, he is unafraid to let it fly, especially from the shorter corner spots. Defensively he’s no slouch either. In only 21 minutes per game, he’s leading the Big 12 in blocked shots (2.7 per game) and has emerged as a terror on the help side. He shows excellent timing and instincts to block shots, and gets off the ground quickly despite his lack of great fluidity. His legs appear to be extremely stiff to the point where it appears he runs with a slight limp. Time will tell whether this is a temporary thing or he will always be a player lacking fluidity and speed. Since he is so young, he could be one of those players who could improve his athletic ability, and flexibility with continued weight training. His lower body strength is probably of the most concern right now, as he can be pushed off the block and out of position by older, more physical NCAA players. His off-the-dribble game is underdeveloped, being the biggest glaring hole in his skills repertoire.
|
|
rw
New Member
Posts: 272
Likes: 73
Joined: August 2018
|
Post by rw on Jul 6, 2020 18:35:39 GMT
Are these based on real life?
Myles Turner 27.4% from 3 in his single season at Texas.
|
|
|
|
Post by killybing on Jul 6, 2020 18:49:57 GMT
Are these based on real life? Myles Turner 27.4% from 3 in his single season at Texas.  |
|
rw
New Member
Posts: 272
Likes: 73
Joined: August 2018
|
Post by rw on Jul 6, 2020 18:57:14 GMT
What are the criteria for the profile players?
It seems a little bs, no? 27% shooter and 40% shooter is the difference between awful and elite. It's not a small bump. It's almost the difference between one of the worst 3 point shooters ever Charles Barkley (26.6%) and Ray Allen (40.0%)
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Jul 6, 2020 19:05:08 GMT
What are the criteria for the profile players? It seems a little bs, no? 27% shooter and 40% shooter is the difference between awful and elite. It's not a small bump. It's almost the difference between one of the worst 3 point shooters ever Charles Barkley (26.6%) and Ray Allen (40.0%) There's no specific criteria for profile players. I'm pretty certain Delap just picks the most well-known names. |
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Jul 6, 2020 19:14:49 GMT
What are the criteria for the profile players? It seems a little bs, no? 27% shooter and 40% shooter is the difference between awful and elite. It's not a small bump. It's almost the difference between one of the worst 3 point shooters ever Charles Barkley (26.6%) and Ray Allen (40.0%) 100% my flub... I pulled it from an NBADraftNet scouting report without looking at his stats... he was shooting 40% haflway through the season and that's where their number came from.
|
|
rw
New Member
Posts: 272
Likes: 73
Joined: August 2018
|
Post by rw on Jul 7, 2020 19:37:13 GMT
What are the criteria for the profile players? It seems a little bs, no? 27% shooter and 40% shooter is the difference between awful and elite. It's not a small bump. It's almost the difference between one of the worst 3 point shooters ever Charles Barkley (26.6%) and Ray Allen (40.0%) 100% my flub... I pulled it from an NBADraftNet scouting report without looking at his stats... he was shooting 40% haflway through the season and that's where their number came from.
Fair, no problem, I was baffled in my rage research comparing others to Frank's outside grade. |
|
