soup
New Member
Posts: 343
Likes: 22
Joined: March 2018
|
Post by soup on Mar 19, 2020 0:24:13 GMT
No it was to bk
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 19, 2020 0:25:09 GMT
We definitely need to wipe out newguy, fecta, and ank in that order. No way all three are town. There shouldn’t be a need to vote on anyone else unless there’s extreme suspicion Why in that order? |
|
soup
New Member
Posts: 343
Likes: 22
Joined: March 2018
|
Post by soup on Mar 19, 2020 0:25:34 GMT
We definitely need to wipe out newguy, fecta, and ank in that order. No way all three are town. There shouldn’t be a need to vote on anyone else unless there’s extreme suspicion Why in that order? And why those 3? |
|
|
|
Post by pointyegg on Mar 19, 2020 0:27:14 GMT
Inactivity along with level of suspicion |
|
soup
New Member
Posts: 343
Likes: 22
Joined: March 2018
|
Post by soup on Mar 19, 2020 0:30:29 GMT
Inactivity along with level of suspicion That could play in to the mafia afk theory. I highly doubt that was the case though. |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Mar 19, 2020 0:31:09 GMT
I did think it was really weird that fecta dropped in to a tie game at the last second where he was on the line to vote for me and then asked if his vote was stupid
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 19, 2020 0:33:39 GMT
Very open to voting Fecta this round.
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Mar 19, 2020 0:35:42 GMT
I did think it was really weird that fecta dropped in to a tie game at the last second where he was on the line to vote for me and then asked if his vote was stupid I’m not sure if I think that means he’s town and not paying attention or mafia and trying to cause confusion |
|
|
|
Post by pointyegg on Mar 19, 2020 0:36:17 GMT
I did think it was really weird that fecta dropped in to a tie game at the last second where he was on the line to vote for me and then asked if his vote was stupid Agreed. Definitely sounds like something you’d ask if you were trying to play off inactivity |
|
|
|
Post by pointyegg on Mar 19, 2020 0:37:28 GMT
We’ll know that if fecta pops in within about 30 minutes of the deadline to argue his case, he’s mafia
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 19, 2020 0:38:52 GMT
Did any civs use their vest and get attacked last night? I think it's the right time to speak.
|
|
|
|
Post by 👼Saint Panktrick's Day👼 on Mar 19, 2020 0:39:18 GMT
My Skrouse vote is because I was 100% wrong about his behavior and thinking his uber-defensiveness to stay in the game indicated he was mafia since he didn’t claim a power role You weren't wrong about his behavior. He was indeed acting uber-defensive. Most often that's a tell for a mafia or civ special. In this case, it was a tell for Skrouse playing poorly and overreacting. |
|
|
|
Post by 👼Saint Panktrick's Day👼 on Mar 19, 2020 0:41:48 GMT
Given the plethora of power roles and night powers, we're not going to be able to do this.
But most typically, having the town at an odd number late game is to the town's benefit. Where even is to the mafia's because they win if the numbers are tied.
Probably not going to apply but something to keep in mind for the Vig.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2020 0:42:35 GMT
Going afk for a couple hours. Mind the rules.
|
|
|
|
Post by 👼Saint Panktrick's Day👼 on Mar 19, 2020 0:44:13 GMT
Bizarre vote. But this reads like a town move. Why would a mafia member randomly decide to dog-pile the player they know is going to be revealed as town? |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Mar 19, 2020 0:45:48 GMT
Bizarre vote. But this reads like a town move. Why would a mafia member randomly decide to dog-pile the player they know is going to be revealed as town? Yeah that reads really weird because if he was saving fecta, fecta could have done that himself Unless fecta was afk and they panicked |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 19, 2020 0:46:04 GMT
Bizarre vote. But this reads like a town move. Why would a mafia member randomly decide to dog-pile the player they know is going to be revealed as town? I find Ank's ready-made excuse of "Either mafia, town special, or bad player" to explain anything related to Skrouse suspicious, but this is a good point re: Bankz's vote. |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Mar 19, 2020 0:46:14 GMT
Then of course he showed up last second and made that odd vote
|
|
|
|
Post by 👼Saint Panktrick's Day👼 on Mar 19, 2020 0:48:09 GMT
Bizarre vote. But this reads like a town move. Why would a mafia member randomly decide to dog-pile the player they know is going to be revealed as town? I find Ank's ready-made excuse of "Either mafia, town special, or bad player" to explain anything related to Skrouse suspicious, but this is a good point re: Bankz's vote. :shrug: It's the truth re: Skrouse. You should not react like that to a random vote going your day on day 1. |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Mar 19, 2020 0:56:29 GMT
Very open to voting Fecta this round. Any reason you’re waiting for permission? |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 19, 2020 0:56:35 GMT
pointyegg do you care to explain your shift in thinking from "go ahead and kill me" to "here are the three most suspicious people that we need to vote off in this order"? I'm beginning to think we don't have a vigilante. They've been encouraged for two days to shoot an inactive and haven't done so. It's possible a standard civ or doctor healed the victim I guess, but I highly doubt a doctor would've healed someone that people felt should be hit by the vigilante. If someone used their vest and was hit by the vigilante, they should let us know.
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 19, 2020 0:57:02 GMT
Very open to voting Fecta this round. Any reason you’re waiting for permission? No reason. Just haven't chosen to cast a vote yet. |
|
soup
New Member
Posts: 343
Likes: 22
Joined: March 2018
|
Post by soup on Mar 19, 2020 0:58:37 GMT
If vig/mafia killed the same person we wouldn’t know that right?
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 19, 2020 1:01:40 GMT
If vig/mafia killed the same person we wouldn’t know that right? I don't believe so...? But the vigilante could still say at this point if they tried to kill Majic night one. It's not like the mafia passed up their night one hit. So, if you exist, go ahead and let us know if you tried to hit Majic night one, Mr. Vigilante...  |
|
|
|
Post by pointyegg on Mar 19, 2020 1:02:27 GMT
pointyegg do you care to explain your shift in thinking from "go ahead and kill me" to "here are the three most suspicious people that we need to vote off in this order"? I'm beginning to think we don't have a vigilante. They've been encouraged for two days to shoot an inactive and haven't done so. It's possible a standard civ or doctor healed the victim I guess, but I highly doubt a doctor would've healed someone that people felt should be hit by the vigilante. If someone used their vest and was hit by the vigilante, they should let us know. Thought I didn’t have the time, it was too much to keep up with, and I wouldn’t be able to contribute anything but it’s starting to get fun |
|
|
|
Post by pointyegg on Mar 19, 2020 1:04:19 GMT
pointyegg do you care to explain your shift in thinking from "go ahead and kill me" to "here are the three most suspicious people that we need to vote off in this order"? I'm beginning to think we don't have a vigilante. They've been encouraged for two days to shoot an inactive and haven't done so. It's possible a standard civ or doctor healed the victim I guess, but I highly doubt a doctor would've healed someone that people felt should be hit by the vigilante. If someone used their vest and was hit by the vigilante, they should let us know. starting to think we have a veteran instead |
|
soup
New Member
Posts: 343
Likes: 22
Joined: March 2018
|
Post by soup on Mar 19, 2020 1:09:19 GMT
Is there any value in going no execution here since we didn’t lose anyone last night? Keeps us from doing something stupid like voting off a power civ.
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Mar 19, 2020 1:17:07 GMT
Do we have a sheriff who can at least point us in the right direction as far as confirming people since we can definitely defend them
We have an active doctor if Delap’s coded message means what I think it does
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 19, 2020 1:23:20 GMT
Been thinking a little bit about Ankly and JHB's interactions. - Ankly is adamant that "No execution" on Day 1 is the wrong move. I don't necessarily think he hates the idea in its entirety - more just the idea of agreeing to it to start because it limits conversation and means less is revealed day 1. That said... - He defended JHB's last second shift to potentially get us to a No Execution situation. If my point above is true that he's not totally against it as long as it doesn't occur from the beginning, it's still definitely worth noting. - He also said his vote of Skrouse was "not random", but in hindsight, it looks like even if it wasn't "random", it wasn't based on any actual evidence. - He also defended JHB for JHB's vote of Skrouse. - He has also defended Pointyegg saying he's almost sure he's clean, giving him 1% odds of being a Machiavellian genius. I understand if folks are suspicious that I put extra faith in Ank in voting for Skrouse. I would be suspicious of me too. But Ank and JHB's interactions are questionable to me, and I don't exempt Pointyegg either. Quotes below: SkrouseThis time it's not random. Switching to no-vote was the correct move. Pointyegg is like 99% clean. 1% Machiavellian genius. You weren't wrong about his behavior. He was indeed acting uber-defensive. Most often that's a tell for a mafia or civ special. In this case, it was a tell for Skrouse playing poorly and overreacting. |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Mar 19, 2020 1:27:41 GMT
Also, I've already mentioned (but will mention again) Ank's pre-emptive defense for voting for Skrouse based on Skrouse's behavior and how I think that's suspicious.
|
|
