|
|
Post by TimPig on Aug 27, 2020 21:22:38 GMT
Extend Cartwright 2 years -4k TimPig You have -5,525 in the bank and can't afford this. |
|
rw
New Member
Posts: 272
Likes: 73
Joined: August 2018
|
Post by rw on Aug 27, 2020 22:32:07 GMT
Extend Cartwright 2 years -4k TimPig You have -5,525 in the bank and can't afford this. What is the limit for going in debt? |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Aug 27, 2020 22:52:33 GMT
You have -5,525 in the bank and can't afford this. What is the limit for going in debt? There isn’t a hard and fast one but you have until the end of the playoffs to write an article or claim so bucks so you can afford the extension. You’ve been in the red since the offseason and had plenty of time to get out of it. |
|
rw
New Member
Posts: 272
Likes: 73
Joined: August 2018
|
Post by rw on Aug 28, 2020 17:20:02 GMT
What is the limit for going in debt? There isn’t a hard and fast one but you have until the end of the playoffs to write an article or claim so bucks so you can afford the extension. You’ve been in the red since the offseason and had plenty of time to get out of it. So you're imposing your own, arbitrary rule here? |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Aug 28, 2020 17:40:13 GMT
There isn’t a hard and fast one but you have until the end of the playoffs to write an article or claim so bucks so you can afford the extension. You’ve been in the red since the offseason and had plenty of time to get out of it. So you're imposing your own, arbitrary rule here? I said you have until the end of the playoffs because that's when an extension needs to be completed by, otherwise he hits free agency. Generally, no one is allowed to go into debt. There are some exceptions when: 1. A transaction is processed by eric before I can get to it. Eric doesn't check the bank of every GM every time a transaction is made, so he relies on me to do it. It's not a perfect system, but me letting him know after the fact that something shouldn't have been processed isn't constructive, because no one has time for him to go back and undo the trade/upgrade/extension and then re-sim. 2. A GM goes in the red but has an article posted or some sort of bucks readily available that they need to cash out. If they will clearly have the funds in a day or two, it's not worth the back and forth, and once again, no one has time for that. In conclusion, quit bitching about your inability to take advantage of an imperfect system and write an article or find another way to accumulate some bucks. |
|
rw
New Member
Posts: 272
Likes: 73
Joined: August 2018
|
Post by rw on Aug 28, 2020 19:37:00 GMT
So you're imposing your own, arbitrary rule here? I said you have until the end of the playoffs because that's when an extension needs to be completed by, otherwise he hits free agency. Generally, no one is allowed to go into debt. There are some exceptions when: 1. A transaction is processed by eric before I can get to it. Eric doesn't check the bank of every GM every time a transaction is made, so he relies on me to do it. It's not a perfect system, but me letting him know after the fact that something shouldn't have been processed isn't constructive, because no one has time for him to go back and undo the trade/upgrade/extension and then re-sim. 2. A GM goes in the red but has an article posted or some sort of bucks readily available that they need to cash out. If they will clearly have the funds in a day or two, it's not worth the back and forth, and once again, no one has time for that. In conclusion, quit bitching about your inability to take advantage of an imperfect system and write an article or find another way to accumulate some bucks. Where is the bitching? I'm asking for a rules clarification. There should be a simple rule ie no one is allowed to make purchases when they are 5k in debt or something to that effect. |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Aug 28, 2020 19:55:15 GMT
I said you have until the end of the playoffs because that's when an extension needs to be completed by, otherwise he hits free agency. Generally, no one is allowed to go into debt. There are some exceptions when: 1. A transaction is processed by eric before I can get to it. Eric doesn't check the bank of every GM every time a transaction is made, so he relies on me to do it. It's not a perfect system, but me letting him know after the fact that something shouldn't have been processed isn't constructive, because no one has time for him to go back and undo the trade/upgrade/extension and then re-sim. 2. A GM goes in the red but has an article posted or some sort of bucks readily available that they need to cash out. If they will clearly have the funds in a day or two, it's not worth the back and forth, and once again, no one has time for that. In conclusion, quit bitching about your inability to take advantage of an imperfect system and write an article or find another way to accumulate some bucks. Where is the bitching? I'm asking for a rules clarification. There should be a simple rule ie no one is allowed to make purchases when they are 5k in debt or something to that effect. "sO yOu'Re ImPosInG yOuR oWn ArBiTrArY rUlE hErE?" It's not arbitrary. You can't go in the negative, but sometimes things allow that to happen to make life easier on the people managing things. |
|
rw
New Member
Posts: 272
Likes: 73
Joined: August 2018
|
Post by rw on Aug 28, 2020 21:00:03 GMT
Where is the bitching? I'm asking for a rules clarification. There should be a simple rule ie no one is allowed to make purchases when they are 5k in debt or something to that effect. "sO yOu'Re ImPosInG yOuR oWn ArBiTrArY rUlE hErE?" It's not arbitrary. You can't go in the negative, but sometimes things allow that to happen to make life easier on the people managing things.It's not arbitrary! Then proceeds to explain how it is, in fact, arbitrary. Bold move there Tim. |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Aug 28, 2020 21:04:01 GMT
"sO yOu'Re ImPosInG yOuR oWn ArBiTrArY rUlE hErE?" It's not arbitrary. You can't go in the negative, but sometimes things allow that to happen to make life easier on the people managing things.It's not arbitrary! Then proceeds to explain how it is, in fact, arbitrary. Bold move there Tim.
/ˈärbəˌtrerē/
adjective
based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.I just explained the system. I'm sorry you can't figure it out. |
|
rw
New Member
Posts: 272
Likes: 73
Joined: August 2018
|
Post by rw on Aug 28, 2020 21:12:28 GMT
It's not arbitrary! Then proceeds to explain how it is, in fact, arbitrary. Bold move there Tim.
/ˈärbəˌtrerē/
adjective
based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.I just explained the system. I'm sorry you can't figure it out. Sigh, you are drawing the line here based on your personal whim. You let me go 5k into debt, I asked the rule and you stated "there isn't a hard a fast one." You have since then explained many scenarios, none of which gives a concrete reason why I was allowed to go 5k into debt then not allowed to go any further. |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Aug 28, 2020 21:26:30 GMT
ar·bi·trar·y
/ˈärbəˌtrerē/
adjective
based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.I just explained the system. I'm sorry you can't figure it out. Sigh, you are drawing the line here based on your personal whim. You let me go 5k into debt, I asked the rule and you stated "there isn't a hard a fast one." You have since then explained many scenarios, none of which gives a concrete reason why I was allowed to go 5k into debt then not allowed to go any further. I'm running banks for 18 GMs with multiple transactions a day. You've been in the red since the beginning of the season. I don't know the exact occasion that caused you to go into the red because I don't remember transactions from weeks prior. Further, I don't remember timelines for when eric may have processed the transaction that put you into the red versus when I would've seen the tag and updated your bank accordingly. Feel free to go back and figure it out for yourself, but I've explained what the standard is and how eric and I apply it, and why said application may not be feasible 100% of the time based on limitations that are out of our control. |
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Aug 29, 2020 13:53:01 GMT
The Orlando Magic extend Shelden Williams 2 years -4k TimPig |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Aug 29, 2020 17:56:38 GMT
Extend Cartwright 2 years -4k TimPig this has been revoked until you get the "dough" |
|
rw
New Member
Posts: 272
Likes: 73
Joined: August 2018
|
Post by rw on Aug 30, 2020 3:50:37 GMT
Sigh, you are drawing the line here based on your personal whim. You let me go 5k into debt, I asked the rule and you stated "there isn't a hard a fast one." You have since then explained many scenarios, none of which gives a concrete reason why I was allowed to go 5k into debt then not allowed to go any further. I'm running banks for 18 GMs with multiple transactions a day. You've been in the red since the beginning of the season. I don't know the exact occasion that caused you to go into the red because I don't remember transactions from weeks prior. Further, I don't remember timelines for when eric may have processed the transaction that put you into the red versus when I would've seen the tag and updated your bank accordingly. Feel free to go back and figure it out for yourself, but I've explained what the standard is and how eric and I apply it, and why said application may not be feasible 100% of the time based on limitations that are out of our control. Your argument is yes we have a flawed system, no I don't want to address it because there's nothing that can be done. Yet you are doing exactly what should be done with my suggested rule so there is clarity. My issue has never been me not being allowed this extension, I think it's perfectly reasonable I shouldn't be allowed to go further in debt. But the application of me not being allowed by a fellow GM is wrong when there are no concrete procedures. Yes, you have stated standards but those standards were only elaborated after stating "there are no hard and fast rule.". I latch onto that because I inquired from chat when going into debt the first place and they said the same thing and other GM's do it as well. Hence why there should be established standards that are posted so that when a GM inquires about this exact situation there is a concrete answer. |
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Aug 30, 2020 16:47:07 GMT
I'm running banks for 18 GMs with multiple transactions a day. You've been in the red since the beginning of the season. I don't know the exact occasion that caused you to go into the red because I don't remember transactions from weeks prior. Further, I don't remember timelines for when eric may have processed the transaction that put you into the red versus when I would've seen the tag and updated your bank accordingly. Feel free to go back and figure it out for yourself, but I've explained what the standard is and how eric and I apply it, and why said application may not be feasible 100% of the time based on limitations that are out of our control. Your argument is yes we have a flawed system, no I don't want to address it because there's nothing that can be done. Yet you are doing exactly what should be done with my suggested rule so there is clarity. My issue has never been me not being allowed this extension, I think it's perfectly reasonable I shouldn't be allowed to go further in debt. But the application of me not being allowed by a fellow GM is wrong when there are no concrete procedures. Yes, you have stated standards but those standards were only elaborated after stating "there are no hard and fast rule.". I latch onto that because I inquired from chat when going into debt the first place and they said the same thing and other GM's do it as well. Hence why there should be established standards that are posted so that when a GM inquires about this exact situation there is a concrete answer. You can’t spend money you don’t have. Seems pretty straightforward. I explained the situations where it might not be possible given our limitations. No one else has had trouble comprehending this. |
|
|
|
Post by troybarnes on Sept 29, 2020 3:57:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Oct 2, 2020 13:55:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by kujo on Oct 6, 2020 15:33:44 GMT
Extend Kelly Oubre Jr. 2 years -4K TimPig |
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Oct 6, 2020 16:37:22 GMT
Extend Kelly Oubre Jr. 2 years -4K TimPig FYI - Tim's bank duty has shifted to wee2dee |
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Oct 6, 2020 16:38:26 GMT
Extend Jimmy King 1 year -2K wee2dee |
|
|
|
Post by kujo on Oct 7, 2020 18:59:09 GMT
Extend Kelly Oubre Jr. 2 years -4K TimPig FYI - Tim's bank duty has shifted to wee2dee Was Tim embezzling too much |
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Oct 8, 2020 17:45:25 GMT
extend ben simmons 2 years -4k wee2dee |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Oct 26, 2020 16:14:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by TimPig on Nov 5, 2020 21:47:30 GMT
Extend Zeke Nnaji 2 years -4k wee2dee |
|
|
|
Post by 👨🏼⚕️delapandemic🚑 on Nov 10, 2020 18:32:39 GMT
Extend Terry Porter for 2 years 4k wee2dee units Please and thank you. |
|
|
|
Post by Logan on Nov 10, 2020 19:32:58 GMT
extend cole anthony 2 years -4k wee2dee |
|
|
|
Post by Majic on Nov 11, 2020 14:19:58 GMT
Extend Onyeka Okongwu 2 years -4k wee2dee |
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Nov 11, 2020 15:06:20 GMT
Extend Joe Dumars 2 years -4k wee2dee |
|
|
|
Post by jhb on Nov 12, 2020 19:26:03 GMT
Extend Saddiq Bey 2 years -4k wee2dee |
|
|
|
Post by troybarnes on Nov 19, 2020 18:29:09 GMT
Extend Andrew Toney for 2 years -4k wee2dee |
|
